NCTE Inbox

July 19, 2005

...ideas
Free access to journal articles and book excerpts mentioned in this Inbox is provided for 21 days. After this free access period expires, articles are available to journal subscribers only.

You're Not Allowed to Read That Text!
Censorship is in the news this week -- from the accusation of "absolute vile and gratuitous sexual premises" in the books targeted in the Fayetteville, Arkansas high school library to the a profane word in the title of a poem in a Seattle, Washington high school literary magazine. In situations like these, the true issue is the power of language and the control of who is allowed to use it. The following resources provide teaching ideas and resources for discussing such issues in the classroom.

Chris Crutcher's "In Defense of Bad Language" (G) from Voices from the Middle urges administrators and teachers concerned about "bad" language to just "Get over it," and argues that we accept authentic language as a matter of respect.

One important way to build respect for the language and situations presented in a text is to work toward both an understanding of the power of books and the reader’s ability to understand those texts. The English Journal article "In Defense of Harry . . . But Not His Defenders: Beyond Censorship to Justice" (M-S) argues the need for "alternative voices and worldviews" in the classroom, whether students are reading the latest Harry Potter novel or another controversial book.

Calls for censorship frequently communicate the tensions between differing cultural and philosophical perspectives. "When Values Clash: Learning from Controversy" (E-M) from Language Arts and "Outside Teachers: Children’s Literature and Cultural Tension" (E-M) from English Leadership Quarterly explore how such conflicts can become opportunities for communities to help students become literate, socially responsible, culturally aware, and contributing citizens.

Even the censorship of visual communication is an issue of the power of the text. The College English article "Deflecting the Political in the Visual Images of Execution and the Death Penalty Debate" (C) explores the visual images that readers are and are not allowed to view and asserts that "the attempt to suppress the visual, as in any censorship of the press, is an attempt to limit debate."

Start getting ready now to discuss Banned Books Week this Fall. For resources, visit the American Library Association's resources for posters, book lists, and answers to frequently asked questions.

For advice, rationales, and other help with challenges to literary works, films and videos, drama productions, or teaching methods, visit the NCTE Anti-Censorship Center.


NOTE: Free access to journal articles mentioned in this Inbox is provided for 21 days. After this free access period expires, articles are available to journal subscribers only. This Inbox Idea was published 02-15-2005.

Initials in annotations indicate academic level of the resource (E=Elementary, M=Middle, S=Secondary, C=College, G=General).

NCTE Home Sign-up for this e-mail E-mail a friend Join NCTE